Scimitar Sword

Posted October 24, 2006 By admin

Scimitar Sword
What are the advantages & disadvantages of sword VS saber/ scimitar?

It seems like Europeans had used the sword during the middle ages. For some reason they began to use curved blade (saber or scimitar) for cavalry as in the late renaissance & through the industrial revolution. What are the advantages & disadvantages of each?

actually, that's only partially true. The weapon of choice in the post middle age era was not the saber, rather, it was the rapier.

In the High Middle Ages, The use of increasingly sophisticated armor began reducing the effectiveness of traditional swords. Men-at-arms began instead employing Maces and war hammers which could do much more damage to an opponent in thick plate than a sword. On the open battle field, the lance was the Knight's primary weapon, attempting to rout the enemy with a single thunderous charge. The effectiveness of middle eastern scimitar-wielding soldiers owes more to their tactics than their armament: they were highly mobile, and deployed in a crescent moon formation that would engulf the Europeaners, who deployed as a horde without coherent ranks or structure.

Later, during the gunpowder era, soldiers armed for singular combat diasapeared. They were replaced by pikemen and musketmen. Cavalry saw a reduced effectiveness during this time as guns could punch a fully armored knight off his horse regardless of his training and equipment. Instead, light cavalry and dragoons became the norm, trying to outmanuever the opposing cavalry and flank the pikemen and musketmen.

Their weapon was a saber because the reduced role of melee combat in this era ment that most soldiers would wear reduced armor to compensate weight. usually no more than a breastplate to protect their chest and a helmet that was opened faced so that they could see and hear orders that were given to them as warfare in Europe became more sophisticated. Therefore, swords became useful again. Curved blades like the saber or scimitar were shaped to have a more effective slashing blade. This was prefered by dragoons because they could put the force of their horse's charge behind their swing. It is preferable to stabbing swords because stabbing swords take a bit more precision, something that matters when one is riding on a galloping,panicked horse!

However, For the city dwellers, piercing swords were always prefered, and by the gunpowder era, the pinnacle of European swordsmanship was the rapier. It was lightweight, balanced, lightning fast, and incredibly lethal. A piercing wound of only a few inches would be lethal in most areas of the body. It's lightweight gave it a distinct advantage over earlier broad swords or long swords, and it's simple martial art style made it easy to pick up and become proficient with it. Rapiers would be the preferred side arm of choice until the invention of more reliable pistols.

The Europeaners ended up ditching hybrid swords like the long sword in favor of specialized swords that did one thing extremely well to the exclusion of everything else. Rapiers and sabers represent the pinnacle of European swordscraftmanship. Rapiers were stabbing swords without equal, sabers were slashing swords without equal.

That's not to say hybrids don't have their place. The Japanese Katana, for example, is a hybrid, designed for excellence in both slashing and stabbing